No, seriously. Any sort of profit you might make from the copyright restrictions you’re proposing (making it illegal to have a text-to-speech feature on e-books) is negated by the sheer assholery that you’re perpetuating. This is like making it illegal to modify your own home to include a wheelchair ramp, because you’d be violating the copyright of the original building architect. I understand that this is not an apples-to-apples comparison, but you’re still being gigantic jerks.
(and all of you who read this, please post it everywhere)